Rantz: Dangerous Jayapal claims Musk, DOGE pushing ‘white ultranationalist Christian ideology under a dictatorial leader’
Feb 26, 2025, 5:00 AM | Updated: 7:26 am

Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., talks with reporters outside the U.S. Capitol after the House reauthorized Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) on Friday, April 12, 2024. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
(Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
After pretending to be concerned with the “dangerous rhetoric” from Donald Trump, Squad grandmother Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Seattle) is only growing more desperate to seemingly inspire potentially violent action against the president and Elon Musk. If only left-wing media outlets would call her out.
At a recent Seattle Townhall event, Jayapal鈥檚 remarks 鈥 accusing Elon Musk鈥檚 Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) of being nothing more than a ruse to implement a 鈥渇ar-right, authoritarian, white ultranationalist Christian ideology under a dictatorial leader鈥 鈥 are yet another example of rhetoric that not only demonizes political opponents but dangerously normalizes violent resistance.
Jayapal鈥檚 words are not new in tone or tenor. Time and again, she has incited fervor among her supporters by calling on them to 鈥渢ake to the streets鈥 and 鈥渇ight tooth and nail.鈥 Such incendiary language聽clearly has the potential to fester into an endorsement of violence, especially given President Donald Trump has experienced two assassination attempts, even taking a bullet to the ear.
More from Jason Rantz: Democrats may force businesses to pay illegal immigrants to go to court
The perils of Pramila Jayapal and her unhinged rhetoric
Political discourse has predictably degenerated into a borage of incendiary soundbites and provocative hyperbole. Nowhere is this more evident than in the rhetoric coming from Pramila Jayapal, a congresswoman with no meaningful legislative accomplishments, yet a fixture on the progressive frontlines for her rhetoric, nevertheless.
The peril of Jayapal’s statements lies not only in their direct incitement of aggressive action. When a prominent leader of a progressive base resorts to hyperbolic indictments of supposed authoritarian fantasies, it stokes an atmosphere of martyrdom.
Progressive activists like Jayapal already see themselves as heroes for their resistance. But for the more mentally deranged in the base, Jayapal is just creating a narrative convincing them that every policy change, every bureaucratic decision, is part of a grand conspiracy to install a 鈥渇ar-right, authoritarian, white ultranationalist Christian ideology under a dictatorial leader,” thereby justifying extreme measures in the name of resistance.
It is a flagrant double standard when the Radical Left has previously decried 濒别蝉蝉听serious rhetoric from their ideological adversaries. Now, they conveniently overlook considerably more unhinged rhetoric emanating from their own party.
Perhaps during her next interview with聽The Seattle Times , Jim Bruner could be a real reporter and not just a publicist, and ask her to defend her past positions on “dangerous rhetoric” when she’s engaging in this kind of vitriol. For now, Bruner seems content writing for the congresswoman.
More from Jason Rantz:听Why would a UW librarian promote censorship?
Pramila Jayapal, intentionally or not, will inspire more real-world violence
In a political environment where trust in institutions is already eroded, the rhetoric employed by figures like Pramila Jayapal risks inspiring real-world violence.
We have seen time and again that when charged language is left unchecked, it can empower extremist factions within a political base 鈥 factions that are willing to cross the line from protest to aggression. We saw that for about a year in the aftermath of the George Floyd death. After overturning Roe v. Wade , there was an against on Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
Ultimately, the rhetoric employed by Jayapal is evidence of a broader crisis in politics鈥攁 crisis where partisan demonization of the political 鈥渙ther鈥 takes precedence over rational policy discussion.
Disagree with a policy choice by Trump or the Radical Left’s newest boogeyman Elon Musk? Then argue it. But claiming Trump is a dictator and Musk a tool to install a 鈥渇ar-right, authoritarian, white ultranationalist Christian ideology” is not delivered in good faith. Its intent is to inspire direct action from a militant and violent base. Jayapal is not engaging in mere rhetorical flourish; it is a dangerous path that can lead to chaos and bloodshed.
More from Rantz:听Deputies livid as anti-Trump, transgender captain given a pass for policy violation
Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the聽podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on聽,听,听听补苍诲.