成人X站

On a frigid Sunday morning at Freeway Park in Seattle, a homeless man huddled next to a makeshift fire, seeking warmth from the biting cold. By Seattle standards, it wasn’t even that cold on Sunday鈥攃ertainly not compared to what it will be like as we get closer to Christmas. Yet when you’re living outside, without bare essentials, an unremarkably cold night can be deadly.

The flames, though offering limited and temporary relief, posed a significant danger鈥攏ot only to him but to the surrounding area. Such fires often spread to the nearby brush. But without it, the homeless man may freeze to death in Seattle. The sad reality is he might very well still end up freezing to death. The odds are not in his favor.

This scene is a stark representation of the conditions faced by Seattle’s homeless population during winter. Yet rather than move them indoors, Seattle, King County, and Washington state Democrats hardly lift a finger to act.

More from Jason Rantz: Washington Democrat pushes bill that makes being homeless a civil right

How bad can the Seattle homeless crisis get this winter?

Over the last few years, King County recorded numbers of homeless deaths鈥攖he highest in two decades. At least 5 died due to exposure to cold temperatures during one cold snap in January 2024.

Of course, the dangers extend beyond the cold. The Seattle area has seen a surge in fires spreading from encampments. These fires often result from attempts to stay warm, sometimes due to your standard bonfires, broken down heaters, or fire perilously close to propane containers. This leads to property damage and poses risks to both the homeless and the broader community.

Seattle’s approach to homelessness, often labeled as compassionate, allows the homeless to remain in outdoor encampments with minimal to no intervention. This policy, presented as some noble attempt to respect personal autonomy, exposes vulnerable individuals to life-threatening conditions. The refusal to consistently enforce policies that would move people indoors stems from claims that sweeps are inhumane. One might argue that allowing individuals to suffer and die on the streets is the true inhumanity.

More from Jason Rantz: Homeless man erects White House encampment in Seattle

It doesn’t have to be this way

Every night that someone sleeps outside in freezing temperatures is a potential emergency. Waiting for severe weather events to open additional shelters is a reactive approach that costs lives. Proactive measures, such as consistently available shelter options and policies that require individuals to utilize them, are necessary. It’s a homelessness emergency and Democratic leaders in Seattle should treat it like one.

Under mayor Bruce Harrell, Seattle has made efforts to address homelessness, including the , which reported a 17% drop in verified tent counts citywide in the second quarter of 2024. While there’s undoubtedly been progress, the devil is in the details.听Verified tent counts doesn’t mean the tents don’t exist. Many times, when there is a sweep with no effort to mandate treatment for the underlying issues causing the homelessness, the people just go somewhere else. Sometimes, they camp out well out of view where they get even less pressure to move indoors.

Sweeps must be coupled with policies that prioritize the immediate safety of individuals via detox, mental health treatment, and shelter, over a misguided interpretation of compassion.

It doesn’t have to be this way. By implementing and enforcing policies that move individuals into shelters, especially during cold weather, we can prevent unnecessary deaths. This approach requires political will and a reevaluation of what true compassion entails. It’s time to act decisively to protect our most vulnerable citizens from the preventable tragedies of freezing to death on our streets.

Listen to The Jason Rantz Show on weekday afternoons from 3-7 p.m. on KTTH 770 AM (HD Radio 97.3 FM HD-Channel 3). Subscribe to the听podcast here. Follow Jason Rantz on听听,听听and.