Seattle aviation experts raise key questions about the DC crash
Jan 30, 2025, 11:41 AM | Updated: 3:13 pm

The wreckage of American Eagle Flight No. 5342 and an Army helicopter after a crash is seen with Reagan National Airport in the background. (Getty Images)
(Getty Images)
In a tragic incident over Washington, D.C., an American Airlines commuter jet flying from Wichita collided with an during its final approach to Reagan National Airport. The collision, which occurred approximately half a mile off the approach, resulted in a fiery explosion and the apparent loss of all passengers and crew members on both aircraft. The crash site is now the focus of a search and recovery operation.
Seattle-based aviation analyst John Nance, a long-time commercial pilot and aviation expert, told 成人X站 Newsradio Thursday that there is “never a single cause” of aviation accidents. Nance has served as an aviation analyst for ABC News and authored several books on aviation safety.
There are always multiple causes for an aviation crash
“There’s always a multiplicity of causes,” Nance emphasized. “One of the chief contributing factors here is probably going to be the inability to make 100% sure that the target you were asked to look at and stay clear of is actually the target the tower was talking about.”
Primary coverage: Everyone aboard jet that collided with an Army helicopter near DC is feared dead
He noted this is an “unprecedented accident.”
“In some respects, it’s not because it involves something that we have been worried about and dealing with in aviation for time immemorial, which is a concept called ‘see and avoid.’ In many cases, it’s a fiction because you can’t really see and avoid everything at nighttime. You’ve got all sorts of lights out there, especially in Washington, D.C. The problem here may come down to a misunderstanding of what they were looking at,” he explained.
Nance explained on “Seattle’s Morning News” on 成人X站 Newsradio Thursday the helicopter crew might have mistakenly identified another object as the regional jet they were supposed to avoid.
“The helicopter crew was asked if they had the RJ, the regional jet, in sight,” he said. “They said ‘Yes,’ and they probably did have something in sight that they thought was the jet, but it wasn’t. We have had near misses and tragedies based on the same sort of thing for a long, long time.”
Jason Rantz opinion: Tragic plane disaster brings out the best, and worst, of us
Another aviation expert joins conversation
Scott Hamilton, another Seattle-area aviation expert, joined
“My first reaction was, why were they doing a training flight in this highly congested airspace at night?” Hamilton said.听“I’m not a military expert, but as a commercial aviation expert, I would expect such training to be conducted in simulators, especially in contested airspace.”
Hamilton has been in commercial aviation for 42 years. He currently is managing director of Leeham Co., an aviation consulting firm on Bainbridge Island.
He said the airstrip involved is one of the busiest single-runway operations in the country, comparable to San Diego’s airport. Hamilton questioned the protocol followed by air traffic controllers, noting that there is video evidence showing the two aircraft converging and a collision avoidance warning being issued.
“We know from audio tapes that air traffic controllers contacted the helicopter pilots, warning them of the CRJ airliner,” Hamilton explained. “However, I haven’t heard of any controller warning the airliner about the helicopter’s proximity.”
When asked about the differences between flying into Reagan National and Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Nance highlighted the unique challenges posed by helicopter traffic around Reagan National.
“We do have a couple of corridors around the SeaTac airport that people can fly small airplanes through as long as they don’t get too high in altitude and violate the ceiling,” he said. “But you’ve got so much helicopter traffic around the Reagan airport that they have corridors that are the pilots’ friends, so to speak. Individual conditions and communication with the tower are crucial.”
NTSB begins investigation into crash
As the began its investigation, Nance outlined the initial steps they would take.
“Right now, it’s about gathering information,” he shared. “Get every readout from every camera, every eyewitness, get them programmed for an interview. Do everything you can to bring in the maximum amount of information, even if it doesn’t seem like it’s necessarily on point. Then, once they have that, they will start working it out in terms of what we know and how this dynamic came together.”
Despite the tragedy, Nance reassured the public about the overall safety of air travel.
“Every day, we launch and recover over 100,000 commercial flights around the world,” he said. “This is the first major crash in the United States in 16 years with such a loss of life. The reality is, you’re in more danger driving to the airport than flying on a commercial flight. The volume of air traffic and how incredibly safe it is, is one of the preeminent accomplishments of mankind.”
Nance also reflected on the broader implications for aviation safety.
“Airline safety is not coming apart at the seams, nor is flying becoming more dangerous,” he said. “What is happening, though, is that the effects of severe operational strain resulting from rapid airline recovery and expansion in the midst of a major and prolonged pilot shortage may be starting to show, like hairline cracks in a marble wall.”
Bill Kaczaraba is a content editor at MyNorthwest. You can read his stories here. Follow Bill on X听 and email him here.听
Charlie Harger is the host of 鈥淪eattle鈥檚 Morning News鈥 on 成人X站 Newsradio. You can read more of Charlie鈥檚 stories and commentaries听here. Follow Charlie听听and email him听here.
Listen to 鈥淛ake and Spike鈥听weekdays from noon-3 p.m. on 成人X站听Newsradio, 97.3 FM.听Subscribe to the podcast here.听