Ninth Circuit takes on major religious accommodation case from Snohomish firefighters
Mar 10, 2025, 7:00 PM | Updated: 8:21 pm
Eight Snohomish Firefighters were put on leave for refusing to accept a COVID-vaccine leading to a religious accomodation trial. (Photo: Snohomish Fire and Rescue)
(Photo: Snohomish Fire and Rescue)
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear a local religious accommodations case that could have far-reaching impacts in the workplace.
Petersen et al. v. Snohomish Regional Fire and Rescue involves eight Washington firefighters placed on indefinite suspension after requesting religious exemptions from their department’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The fire department claimed that allowing unvaccinated firefighters to work would have caused undue hardship, but the firefighters argue that their safety record proves otherwise.
More from MyNorthwest: Dramatic rescue prompts South County Fire to emphasize lifejacket safety
Vaccine mandates head to Ninth Circuit years later
This decision could set a precedent for how religious accommodation cases are handled, particularly in the context of vaccine mandates. It could also set up the issue to be heard by the United States Supreme Court.
鈥淭his case is about ensuring that employees are not forced to choose between their religious beliefs and their jobs,鈥� the plaintiffs said in a joint statement. 鈥淭he Ninth Circuit鈥檚 decision will have far-reaching implications for religious liberty in the workplace.鈥�
Attorney Jennifer Kennedy, representing the firefighters, will argue that the district court鈥檚 dismissal of the case failed to uphold the Supreme Court鈥檚 strengthened standard for religious accommodation.
鈥淓mployers must provide hard evidence of actual cost to business operations, not just speculative risks,鈥� she stated in a release.
Oral arguments are scheduled for聽April 3, 2025, at the Pioneer Courthouse in Portland.
More from MyNorthwest: Washington state AG sues Adams County over immigration enforcement
Follow Bill Kaczaraba on Send news tips here.
