Trump downplays national security team texting military operation plan on Signal as a minor ‘glitch’
Mar 25, 2025, 10:03 AM | Updated: 8:40 pm
WASHINGTON (AP) 鈥� President Donald Trump on Tuesday downplayed the texting of sensitive plans for a military strike against Yemen’s Houthis this month to a group chat that included a journalist, saying it was 鈥渢he only glitch in two months鈥� of his administration as Democratic lawmakers heaped criticism on the administration for handling highly sensitive information carelessly.
Trump told NBC News that the lapse 鈥渢urned out not to be a serious one,” and articulated his continued support for national security adviser Mike Waltz, who mistakenly added the editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, to the chain that included 18 senior administration officials discussing planning for the strike.
鈥淢ichael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he鈥檚 a good man,” Trump said in the NBC interview.
But the use of messaging app Signal to discuss a sensitive operation has opened the administration to blistering criticism from Democratic lawmakers who expressed outrage at the White House’s and senior administration officials’ insistence that no classified information was shared. Senior administration officials have struggled to explain why the publicly available app was used to discuss such a delicate matter.
One participant in the Signal chat, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, acknowledged during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing on Tuesday that she was traveling overseas during the exchange. She wouldn’t say whether she was using her personal or government-issued phone because the matter is under review by the White House National Security Council.
Both Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who also was a participant in the Signal exchange and also testified at Tuesday’s intelligence hearing, faced blistering criticism from lawmakers.
鈥淭his is an embarrassment,鈥� said Sen. Jon Ossoff, a Georgia Democrat. 鈥淭his is utterly unprofessional. There鈥檚 been no apology. There鈥檚 been no recognition of the gravity of this error.鈥�
In the run-up to his 2016 election victory over Democrat Hillary Clinton, Trump urged criminal prosecution of the former secretary of state for communicating about classified information with her aides on a private email server she set up. The matter was investigated, but the FBI ultimately recommended against charges. None were brought.
Clinton was among Democrats this week to criticize Trump administration officials’ use of Signal.
鈥滐拷锟� You have got to be kidding me,鈥� Clinton said in an X post that spotlighted The Atlantic article.
Trump also faced charges for mishandling classified information at his Mar-a-Lago resort following his first White House term. Those charges were later dismissed.
But on Tuesday, top administration officials were insistent the Democratic outrage about the matter was misplaced.
On Capitol Hill, Ratcliffe and Gabbard told lawmakers that no classified information was included in the texts about U.S. attack plans in the message chain.
Democrats pushed back, saying the leaked military plans show a sloppy disregard for security, but Ratcliffe insisted no rules were violated.
鈥淢y communications to be clear in the Signal message group were entirely permissible and lawful and did not include classified information,鈥� Ratcliffe told lawmakers in the hearing that was supposed to be focused on global security threats.
Facing heated questions from Democratic Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, Gabbard said there鈥檚 a difference between 鈥渋nadvertent鈥� releases of information and intentional leaks. 鈥淭here was no classified material that was shared,鈥� Gabbard said.
Warner, though, said the lapse in security could have cost lives.
鈥淚f this information had gotten out, American lives could have been lost. If the Houthis had this information they could reposition their defensive systems,鈥� Warner said.
In response to questions from Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, Gabbard and Ratcliffe said they would participate in an audit looking into administration officials’ use of Signal. Wyden said the matter must be investigated.
鈥淚鈥檓 of the view that there ought to be resignations,鈥� Wyden said.
FBI Director Kash Patel, appearing with Ratcliffe and Gabbard at the hearing, said he was only recently briefed on the Signal chat matter and doesn鈥檛 have an update on whether the FBI has opened an investigation into it. Warner asked for an update by the end of the day.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in his first comments on the matter on Monday, attacked the journalist who received the messages, Goldberg, as 鈥渄eceitful鈥� and a 鈥渄iscredited so-called journalist鈥� while alluding to previous critical reporting of Trump from the publication.
鈥淣obody was texting war plans and that鈥檚 all I have to say about that,鈥� Hegseth said in an exchange with reporters on Monday.
Signal is an app that can be used for direct messaging and group chats as well as phone and video calls. It uses end-to-end encryption for its messaging and calling services that prevents any third party from viewing conversation content or listening in on calls.
In other words, messages and calls sent on Signal are scrambled; only the sender and recipient at each end will have the key to decipher them.
Signal鈥檚 encryption protocol is open source, meaning that it鈥檚 freely available for anyone to inspect, use or modify. The encryption protocol is also used by another popular chat service, social media company Meta鈥檚 WhatsApp platform.
Government officials have used Signal for organizational correspondence, such as scheduling sensitive meetings. But in the Biden administration, people who had permission to download it on their White House-issued phones were instructed to use the app sparingly, according to a former national security official who served in the administration.
The official, who requested anonymity to speak about methods used to share sensitive information, said Signal was most commonly used to notify someone that they should check for a classified message sent through other means.
The use of Signal became more prevalent during the last year of the Biden administration after federal law enforcement officials warned that China and Iran were hacking the White House as well as officials in the first Trump administration, according to the official.
Sen. Angus King, a Maine Independent, questioned Ratcliffe and Gabbard over their assertion that no classified information was included in the chat.
鈥淚t鈥檚 hard for me to believe that targets and timing and weapons would not have been classified,鈥� he said.
___
AP writer Kelvin Chan in London contributed reporting.
